The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
Blog Article
five. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation from the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led for the recovery of sleeping supplements on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been made before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected during the liver but not from the abdomen. As a result, the recovery of explained sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for your complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of the motorcycle.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon from the prosecution against the petitioner and his higher than mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it appropriate for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
Allow’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
In almost any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. On the list of most critical crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 from the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is crucial to be sure justice prevails.
department concerned shall present the complete list of ACRs of your concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) read more Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case in the petitioners for promotion could be deemed, however, we're crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, issue to availability of vacancy subject for the approval with the competent authority.
The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report to your court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was obtaining counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of the actions.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively set up now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Stacy, a tenant in a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not offered her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a brand new state legislation that needs a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.